AI work that holds in finance.
Three finance engagements across shadow AI, production agents, and AI transformation economics.
Three finance engagements across shadow AI, production agents, and AI transformation economics.
The strongest case is the one that shows the before-state, the evidence, and what changed by the next operating meeting.
75 shadow AI cases, 20 unauthorized MCP wires, 12 sanctioned tools moved into cadence, and one board-ready AI value/risk view.
Read the case study →Each story shows the operating shape, the evidence, and what shipped.
75 shadow AI cases, 20 unauthorized MCP wires, 12 sanctioned tools moved into cadence, and one board-ready AI value/risk view.
6 acquisitions in 24 months, 8 legal entities, heterogeneous tooling, and two PE owners asking for one view of AI value and risk.
60% to 95% FP&A accuracy, 20% fewer false positives, 90+ regression scenarios, and rollout to 100+ customers.
FP&A AI accuracy stalled at 60%. The product needed a stronger context layer, better retrieval, tuned prompts, reviewer agents, and deterministic SQL paths for finance-critical answers.
$20M modeled 10-year NOI/NPV uplift, 20% lower CapEx, and 6% improved leasing value.
AI capability center stand-up across leasing, CapEx, predictive maintenance. No central data layer, asset-level data siloed across outsourced operators.
Pick the engagement that matches the board question in front of you.
Find shadow AI, unauthorized MCP paths, duplicate tooling, and the board-readable view that decides the next move.
See AI Audit →Fix context, retrieval, reviewer agents, SQL fast paths, and release evals until the product is ready for customers.
See AI Engineering →Turn AI ambition into operating economics: workflow changes, data accountability, and value evidence in finance terms.
See AI Transformation →Leave with the operating read: AI value, AI risk, fluency gaps, owners, and the next funded workstream.