AI strategy, transformation, and fluency, with governance and evals built in.See the full operating read →
Healthcare · The evidence door

Clear the coding queue without breaking the audit trail.

For the VP of Revenue Cycle and the CMIO who have to clear more charts without shipping a code an auditor or a payer can question.

Codestraced
Reviewermodel
Gatehuman

Every code traced to the chart. Every output reviewed.

Every claim in the read traces back to source evidence, ownership, and the workflow decision it supports.

Valuefund next
Riskcontain now
Fluencytrain where work changed
At a glanceBuyer: VP Revenue Cycle / CMIO / Health-System COOProduction coder workspace: assign, code, review, auditAutonomous coding pipeline: POC with a design partnerEvery code evidence-linked to chart textThree-model pipeline, human accept/edit gate
What the assist puts on every code

The evidence behind every code, before anyone bills it.

0Models before a human sees it
0Human accept/edit gate, every output
0%Of codes linked to chart text
0Codes that ship without evidence

Illustrative shape of the design, not a single customer. Accuracy and throughput figures are held qualitative until measured in your environment.

Four levers

Where the leverage actually lands.

01

Coder throughput

The AI runs the first pass and shows its work. Coders review and sign off instead of typing every code from a blank chart, so more charts clear per coder per day.

02

Evidence on every code

Every suggested code links back to the exact chart text that justifies it. An unexplained code never reaches a claim, because an unexplained code is unbillable.

03

Independent review

A separate reviewer model checks the coder model before a human sees the output. Confidence scoring and hallucination detection flag the weak calls for a closer look.

04

Audit-ready by design

Role-based assign, code, review and audit with full logging. A payer or an auditor can reconstruct who decided what, and why, on any chart.

The coding pipeline

From chart text to a code you can defend.

A chart goes in. A billable, evidence-linked code comes out, with the reasoning attached at every step. The trail a coder uses to accept a code is the same trail an auditor uses to defend it.

Ingest & extract

OCRClinical NLPEntity extraction

Pre-validation model

Chart completenessCodeable encounter

Coding model

ICD-10 / CPTUMLS / SNOMED groundedConfidence scoreEvidence link

Reviewer model

Independent adversaryHallucination detectionLow-confidence flag

Human accept/edit gate

Coder signs offEdits logged

Billable coded chart

Evidence-linkedAudit-ready

Audit trail

Who, what, whyRole-based access
What changes on the floor

Same charts, with the evidence attached.

One assist, read four ways by the four people who have to live with the code.

TodayWith the assist
The coderTypes every code from a blank chart, a few dozen a dayReviews an AI first pass with the evidence already attached
The auditor"The AI said so" is not an answerEvery code traces to the chart text that justifies it
The denialUnexplained codes get kicked back, unbillableEach code ships with its evidence, ready for the payer
The CMIOAI in the clinical workflow is a black-box riskAn independent reviewer and a human gate on every output
Frequently asked

Direct answers.

Not yet. The coder workspace is in production today. The autonomous coding pipeline is a POC running with a launch design partner. We hold accuracy and throughput figures qualitative until they are measured in your environment, rather than quoting numbers from a deck.

AI built across the board

Start with the AI work that moves the number. Keep the proof built in.

Start with Strategy, Transformation, or Fluency; use Quick Audit when the first need is an independent read on what is already running.